Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) underpins the UK’s modern digital economy—but growing threats require urgent national action.

The UK’s recent announcement of a new cross-government programme to strengthen Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) resilience marks a major shift in national security strategy. The UK Hydrographic Office (UKHO), working with the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT), has formally initiated a coordinated approach to strengthening timing, navigation and geodesy infrastructure across government and critical national infrastructure (CNI).

This move reflects a fundamental truth: PNT is now as essential as electricity, clean water or telecommunications. It underpins maritime and aviation safety, coordinates energy networks, timestamps financial transactions, and synchronises the telecommunications networks that power the digital economy. Yet it remains fragile—dependent on weak satellite signals that can be jammed, spoofed or degraded by natural phenomena.

PNT: The Hidden Utility Driving Modern Society

PNT is often invisible to the public, but it silently enables critical systems that keep the UK functioning. The “Positioning” and “Navigation” elements support transport networks, shipping lanes, aviation routes and logistics operations. The “Timing” component underpins mobile networks, trading platforms, energy grids, data centres and public emergency services.

Much of the UK’s PNT capability is currently delivered via Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), including GPS, Galileo and GLONASS. These satellite constellations deliver highly accurate time signals and location data, which modern systems rely on for coordination, safety and efficiency. But their signals arrive at the Earth’s surface at extremely low power—making them inherently vulnerable.

Government modelling has shown that the cost of a 24-hour GNSS outage could exceed £1.4 billion, with widespread disruption spreading across transport, finance, energy, and emergency services. A longer outage could cause cascading failures, affecting supply chains, air traffic, shipping, and digital communications.

• Transport: maritime navigation, aviation routing and rail synchronisation rely heavily on GNSS-derived PNT.
• Energy & Utilities: power grid phase alignment and demand balancing depend on precise timing signals.
• Finance: financial markets and payments systems use PNT timestamps to ensure auditability and transaction integrity.
• Telecommunications: mobile networks, 5G and data centres rely on PNT for synchronisation and network handovers.
• Emergency Services: ambulance, police and fire services require accurate location and time for response coordination.

The Growing Threat Landscape: Jamming, Spoofing and Hybrid Warfare

Despite their importance, GNSS-dependent systems remain fragile. Their vulnerabilities are no longer theoretical. Across global conflict zones, ports, airports and critical transport corridors, GNSS interference—both jamming and spoofing—has been repeatedly observed. Criminal groups, state actors and non-state adversaries have already weaponised these vulnerabilities.

Jamming blocks GNSS signals entirely, denying service. This can be done with inexpensive, portable equipment. Spoofing is even more dangerous: attackers broadcast carefully manipulated GNSS-like signals, persuading receivers that they are somewhere else or at a different time. This can misdirect vessels, confuse aircraft, disrupt autonomous systems or corrupt time-dependent financial and telecom systems.

The broader geopolitical context amplifies these risks. State-sponsored electronic warfare units increasingly target satellite-dependent systems as part of grey-zone operations. GNSS disruption has been documented near conflict areas, strategic maritime chokepoints and major ports. As global tensions rise, PNT disruption becomes an attractive tool for strategic coercion or destabilisation.

Natural threats also loom large. Solar storms and space weather events can degrade or disable satellite signals. With no terrestrial redundancy, the UK remains exposed to hazards that could disrupt GNSS for hours or days at a time.

“GNSS dependence has become a single point of failure for the UK’s digital economy—one that adversaries can now exploit at scale.”

Building a Resilient, Multi-Layered PNT Architecture

The UK’s approach to PNT resilience represents a strategic shift from dependence to diversity. Rather than relying exclusively on satellites, the UK is moving toward a national architecture that integrates multiple sources of positioning and timing to provide continuity of service even during GNSS outages or attacks.

The multi-layered strategy includes:

• eLoran: A high-power, ground-based navigation and timing system resistant to jamming and spoofing.
• National Timing Centre (NTC): A distributed, GNSS-independent network of highly accurate clocks for telecoms and financial services.
• GNSS interference monitoring: National-scale detection of jamming, spoofing and signal degradation.
• Enhanced geodesy capabilities: Improvements to UK reference frames and terrestrial measurement systems.
• Cross-government PNT Working Group: Coordination across defence, transport, telecoms, maritime, aviation and critical infrastructure sectors.

This architecture is designed to ensure that if one component fails—whether due to hostile action or natural events—others can maintain minimum national operating capability. It is a pragmatic, modern approach to PNT assurance.

Implications for DFIR, CNI Operators and National Security

For digital forensics and incident response teams, PNT disruption presents complex attribution challenges. GNSS interference incidents can masquerade as system glitches, equipment failure or cyber compromise. Without explicit monitoring of PNT integrity, organisations may misdiagnose the root cause of outages or performance degradation.

There are several implications for DFIR:

• PNT monitoring must become a standard telemetry source. Logs should include GNSS signal quality, timing offsets, and interference detection.
• Incident response playbooks must include PNT-specific failure modes. Particularly for aviation, maritime operations, energy systems and data centres.
• Timing integrity must be treated as a cyber security concern. Compromised timestamps can invalidate logs, disrupt financial transactions, and corrupt forensic evidence.
• Threat intelligence teams should track GNSS interference events globally. These often indicate broader geopolitical or cyber-physical activity.

CNI operators should now perform PNT dependency audits, identify single points of failure and deploy multi-source timing and location systems. GNSS-only receivers are no longer acceptable for critical systems.

Conclusion: PNT Resilience as a National Priority

The UK’s renewed commitment to PNT resilience is both overdue and essential. As cyber-physical threats accelerate and reliance on satellite timing deepens, the nation must treat PNT as critical infrastructure—engineered for resilience, redundancy and survivability.

For DFIR teams, national security professionals and CNI operators, the message is clear: PNT disruption is not just a technical problem. It is a strategic vulnerability with systemic consequences. The organisations that act now—by strengthening PNT visibility, adopting alternative timing sources and integrating PNT failure scenarios into incident response planning—will be best positioned to maintain continuity when GNSS degradation inevitably occurs.

---

---